I built ClawKeeper because I did not like what I was seeing.

OpenClaw is powerful right out of the gate. You can spin up an agent in minutes. It can execute code, pull in skills, access your filesystem, talk to external APIs. As an engineer, that feels incredible. As a security person, it should make you a little uncomfortable.

These agents run with broad system access. They execute arbitrary code. They pull skills from a marketplace that is not deeply vetted. When you move that from a local experiment to a production host with real credentials and network access, the risk profile changes fast.

Traditional scanners do not understand this model. They look for known CVEs, misconfigured ports, outdated packages. They do not understand an autonomous agent that can install a new skill tomorrow, expose a secret through a prompt, or quietly expand its permissions over time. You can get a clean scan and still be one bad skill away from a serious incident.

[access clawkeeper.dev]

That gap is why I built ClawKeeper.

I did not want teams bolting security on after their OpenClaw demo turned into something customer facing. I wanted security to be part of the first install. Not a checklist you promise to get to later.

ClawKeeper starts with one CLI. A single curl command. Pure bash. No dependencies. Run it on macOS or Linux and you immediately see where you stand.

It runs 44 checks across five phases. It audits your host, your network, and your OpenClaw configuration. It flags what is wrong and fixes common issues automatically. Then it gives you a letter grade from A to F. It is blunt on purpose. Either your environment is hardened or it is not.

When you are ready to deploy, the guided setup installs OpenClaw with hardened defaults. Configs locked down. Environment files secured. Services isolated correctly. You can deploy with Docker or natively. The point is you are not guessing which settings matter.